Los Angeles transportation history is full of wonderful projects, proposals, people and other stories. Many of them are familiar (as is the mythology surrounding them) while others are not well-known at all.
A few weeks ago, we celebrated the 50th anniversary of Freeway Flyer service and recounted the inauguration of bus service bringing suburban workers downtown, which continues to this day.
Prior to the 1960 Freeway Flyer rollout, The Los Angeles Metropolitan Traffic Association released the 1953 Express Busses On Freeways Transit Study.
The following year, the Association issued a supplemental study to address how buses on freeways would get downtown workers into the Central Business District since the freeways did not penetrate the area and riders would have to transfer to other transit options. The 1954 Supplemental Study Of Mass Transportation: Express Busses In Subways submitted on January 24, 1955 must go down as one of the more eye-opening proposals in Los Angeles’ colorful transportation history.
Several interesting and prescient recommendations came out of this supplemental study. They include:
Street Arcades which contemplate set-back space to be taken out of frontage of buildings to make room for extra lanes on the streetSpecial Street Lane For Buses would set aside curb lane for use of buses and restrict certain streets exclusively to mass transportation
Intersection Separations provide for excavation and installation of escalators or ramps for pedestrians to cross below street surface, as well as escalators or ramps for crossing intersections above street surface
One-Way Street Proposals
Elevated Roadways in existing alleys for buses
Staggered Business Hours reinstating war-time requirements that not all businesses be open and closed at the same time, presumably mitigating traffic
Night Loading And Unloading of merchandise at street curbs during night hours
Fringe Parking lots serviced by shuttle buses or express buses on freeways operating downtown
Bus Subways providing “the most practical means of extending the freeway system through the Central Business District”
Yes, a “bus subway” was a serious proposal for carrying express buses from outlying freeways into downtown to avoid further contributing to congestion in the business district (recognized as the area bound by Figueroa Street, Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles Street and Pico Boulevard). In fact, the proposal as submitted was regarded as “realizably cheap.”
It recommended the “cut and cover” construction procedure as the most practical in the Central Business District, with work proceeding in “somewhat leisurely fashion with finish scheduled coincidentally with the Olympic Freeway south” of downtown.
Each of the proposals in this study are worthy of discussion, but it is the underground express bus network that really stands out, not only for its unique characteristics, but because it was featured on the front and back covers of the study. Those illustrations are featured here at the beginning and end of this post.
In the study’s cover letter to the Board of Directors, the authors noted that “we herewith submit further studies — limited, of course, because of lack of funds, staff, and time — of the mass transportation problem in the Central Business District developed along such phases as seem essential now.”
Their lack of funds, staff, and time should certainly not be regarded as any hindrance to their creativity.
We wanted to follow up on yesterday’s post about the proposed underground express bus network from the 1954 Supplemental Study Of Mass Transportation: Express Busses In Subways.
The study is accompanied by maps for the proposed subterranean bus network, which we have reproduced here with a few provisos.
First, they are not oriented in the way we are normally used to viewing maps. Rather than having north at the top of the page, the view is toward the southwest. Due north is at the lower right where one can locate the Four-Level Interchange and Chinatown below (north) of it.
Also, in order to provide the “big picture,” the maps are reproduced here by piecing together three different pages from the original report. The original maps were published at slightly different scales, so the streets do not quite line up properly in the unified map.
The plan called for entrance to Downtown from the north, south, east and west.
From the north, buses would enter and exit the “Hollywood Parkway” at Hill Street and Spring Streets and travel underground starting at Temple into the Central Business District.
From the south, buses would approach and depart the planned “Olympic Parkway” at Hill Street and Main Street and travel underground starting at Pico Boulevard into the city’s core.
From the west, express buses would connect to the “Harbor Parkway” at Olympic Boulevard and 7th Street and travel underground starting at Figueroa Street into the business district.
From the east, buses would enter and exit the center of downtown via 7th Street and an elevated roadway near 6th and San Pedro Streets.
Other features can be seen in these maps. The proposed “Riverside Parkway” was proposed for Elysian Park where Dodger Stadium now stands, and the “Industrial Parkway” was suggested for the eastside of downtown. It would balance out the Harbor Freeway on the west, and was supposed to run through the current-day Warehouse District and Arts District into the area just east of Union Station where Metro’s Gateway Headquarters now stands.
While many transit plans from the past were never realized, it is worth noting that this study proposed integration of existing and new transit projects. The Hollywood Freeway and Harbor Freeway were already in existence, and planners anticipated freeways to the east and south of downtown with a futuristic underground bus network tying it all together to make it function as one system.
The “Riverside Parkway” and “Industrial Parkway” were never constructed. The “Olympic Parkway” is now known as the Santa Monica Freeway (I-10) running south of downtown to the ocean, and the Four-Level Interchange, the first “stack interchange” in the world, had just fully opened the year before in 1953.
It gives one pause to consider that plans for the current Downtown Regional Connector Transit Corridor also incorporate a new transit project to make existing ones function in a more integrated fashion. It “will enable all Los Angeles County rail and bus transit, as well as all intercity transit service, to operate more efficiently and attract higher ridership, thus reducing roadway congestion, improving regional air quality and reducing the region’s carbon footprint.”
While no one in 1954 was concerned with carbon footprints, the vexing problem of moving people in and out of central Los Angeles as smoothly as possible and connecting existing regional transit to new downtown projects was a primary concern more than half a century ago.